Scott, I'm sorry to see that you, obviously, overlooked my first point and well meant advice to familiarize with the underlying issues before adding nothing sensible or new to this discussion...
That is, for sure, annoying. Regards, Pierre Op Apr 21, 2012 om 14:42 heeft Scott Gray <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > I'm sorry if my first point and the use of capitals for emphasis offended you > but I think you forget to actually respond to the main point, the > configurability of a configuration file... > > Regards > Scott > > On 22/04/2012, at 12:32 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> Scott, >> >> Please see my comments inline. >> >> >> Op 21 april 2012 11:35 schreef Scott Gray <[email protected]> het >> volgende: >> >>> I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two >>> points: >>> >> >> Maybe you should, so you know what the issue is about. >> >> >>> 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read. >>> >> >> I wasn't. Just defending the case. Let me apologize for everybody who makes >> you feel annoyed. >> >> >>> 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup >>> doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT. >>> >> >> Using capitals is in terms of nettique is like shouting. It could be >> perceived as agressive. One could feel annoyed! >> >> >>> >>> You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it >>> removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release. >>> But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then >>> change them to to your heart's content in your >> >> >> Profanity isn't called for. Be civil! >> >> >>> downloaded copy. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in >>>> your way. I don't know.... >>>> >>>> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so >>>> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can >>> NOT >>>> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new >>> port >>>> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production >>> port >>>> numbers) are expected to be not? >>>> >>>> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the >>>> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is >>>> asked for by the community.... >>>> >>>> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and >>>> this community along. >>>> >>>> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other >>>> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or >>>> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read >>> SVN). >>>> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the >>>> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through. >>>> >>>> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug >>>> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not >>>> going to be implemented in a release. >>>> >>>> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this >>>> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of >>>> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or >>>> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but >>>> being part of this community) it often seems like your not. >>>> >>>> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not, >>>> please state so and ..... >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux < >>> [email protected] >>>>> het volgende: >>>> >>>>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported, >>>>> unless there is a consensus in the community. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Author: erwan >>>>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012 >>>>>> New Revision: 1328518 >>>>>> >>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev< >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev> >>>>>> Log: >>>>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins >>>>>> >>>>>> Modified: >>>>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-** >>>>>> containers.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-** >>>>>> containers.xml >>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/** >>>>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=** >>>>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff< >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff >>>> >>>>>> ==============================**==============================** >>>>>> ================== >>>>>> --- >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml >>>>>> (original) >>>>>> +++ >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml >>>>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012 >>>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License. >>>>>> >>>>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server --> >>>>>> <container name="naming-container" >>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.* >>>>>> *NamingServiceContainer"> >>>>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/> >>>>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/> >>>>>> </container> >>>>>> >>>>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher --> >>>>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>>>>> RmiServiceContainer"> >>>>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/> >>>>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/> >>>>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/> >>>>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/> >>>>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/> >>>>>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/> >>>>>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/> >>>>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License. >>>>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/> >>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/> >>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/> >>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/> >>>>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/> >>>>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/> >>>>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/> >>>>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License. >>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> >>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> >>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/> >>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/> >>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> >>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/> >>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> >>>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License. >>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> >>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> >>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/> >>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/> >>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> >>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/> >>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >
