If, as Adam mentioned, it is an issue caused by the time-slice in your box, then setting a greater timeout may fix the issue... if you will be able to make it work with, let's say 600 ms (or even 1s) then I would like to commit the change to make the test a bit more robust (even if it will be slower).
Jacopo On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > On 4/30/2012 10:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> >>> I tried experimenting with the sleep timing and I also replaced the >>> Thread.sleep call with a safer version, but the tests still failed. >> interesting... but if you change the Thread.sleep timeout from 200 to 2000 >> it works, right? > > I changed it to 300. By the way, the test finally passed for the first time > when I had another non-OFBiz process running at the same time that was making > heavy use of the hard disk. > > -Adrian >
