Here is what I did. Took the output from RAT after it had marked the license files distinguishing the files that need license Vs the others. All files that did not have a license (and were not a binary file were marked with !?????). Outof this lot, I assumed svg files did not need the license considering that they were graphics files. I also removed derby/db.lck files as well as .class files.
>From the remaining 1985, I just knocked off all files under /home/buildslave2/slave2/ofbiz-trunk/build/framework/images/webapp/images/jquery, all 597 of them. 1. I now have an assorted bunch of files under /home/buildslave2/slave2/** ofbiz-trunk/build/framework/**base/build/ as well. Should I be ignoring them? 2. I assume xml, xsl, dtd, java, groovy, ftl files should have the Apache License and will create a patch for each of them. As I come up with some other files that are not part of the above, I will keep them for later and ask for help. Does this sound like a plan? --Venkat On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Venkat, > > It's great to offer your help. I'm afraid though that you will no be aware > of some specificities (like the ones I underlined below: all docbookc and > jQuery files) > So the 1st thing is to distinguish patterns in order to exclude them. For > instance, > all files under runtime should be neglicted > those under > /home/buildslave2/slave2/**ofbiz-trunk/build/framework/** > base/build/gen-src > are generated, etc. > > On the other hand files like > JsLanguageFileMappingCreator.**java > OnePageCheckoutOptions.groovy > should have a license header... > > Also please be sure to work in the section which begins by > > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B > Compressed archives will be marked A > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N > > HTH > > > Jacques > > From: "Venkat Mangudi" <venkatmang...@gmail.com> > >> There are about 1985 files without Apache License as per the RAT report. >> Different types of file dtd, xsl, xml, groovy, java, js and some more. >> >> I should check each file and verify/add Apache License to it, right? Who >> did this last time? Maybe I can get a few pointers. >> >> --Venkat >> >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> Jacques, >>> >>> The amended help files (regarding licence statement in both locale EN and >>> NL, and improvements to content of locale in EN) including the >>> associcated >>> structure files are uploaded as a patch in >>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802> >>> . >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Pierre >>> >>> 2012/5/18 Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> >>> >>> > Jacques, >>> > >>> > I will amend immediately the help files for both EN and NL locales. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Pierre >>> > >>> > >>> > 2012/5/18 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >>> > >>> >> BTW you don't have to worry about docbook. We already treated it >>> >> seriously. A worry less... >>> >> On the other hand we need to put an ASL2 license in all Help_*.xml >>> files >>> >> where it's missing (my fault when committing Pierre's work) >>> >> All jQuery is of course also OK, etc. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Jacques >>> >> >>> >> From: "Venkat Mangudi" <venkatmang...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> >>> >>> >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> You have a dynamic (updated at each builbot - our CI - build) RAT >>> report >>> >>>> at >>> >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/******ofbiz/rat-output.html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/****ofbiz/rat-output.html> >>> < >>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/****ofbiz/rat-output.html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/**ofbiz/rat-output.html> >>> > >>> >>>> <http:/**/ci.apache.org/**projects/ofbiz/**rat-output.**html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/**rat-output.html> >>> < >>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**ofbiz/rat-output.html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/rat-output.html> >>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Be careful, this must be interpreted with a grain of salt... >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Will get on it right away. Thank you... >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Venkat >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Venkat >> >> -- Regards, Venkat
