From: "Ean Schuessler" <e...@brainfood.com>
> Some confusing things there. Most strangely, 4,909,882 lines added in the 
> last 30 days yet 679,749 lines total project size? Something seems to be 
> amiss. 

It's not quite clear indeed, maybe it does not represent well the activity. 
This is certainly more reliable 
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openerp/analyses/latest/languages_summary
A comparaison 
https://www.ohloh.net/p/Apache-OFBiz/analyses/latest/languages_summary

These are very rough numbers, only to be taken as statistical and trends I 
believe.

Also I don't know much about OpenErp, but I think there are a lot of addons, 
which are no counted there.

> To me, we should be creaming these guys on the AGPL license alone.
> I understand that many businesses are small enough to just "not care". 

Yes they just don't care, because most of them don't built  software to sell 
upon it, only use it as final users.

>Business owners with even a moderate legal awareness should be aware that the 
>AGPL could complicate their ability to transition from a proprietary solution 
>to an open one.

I'm not quire sure what you mean, but anyway I don't sell OpenErp ;)

My primary intention was just to note that they have much more committers(?) 
doing much more commits(?)
When you look into details numbers are certainly misleading:  
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openerp/contributors?page=47&sort=latest_commit&time_span=12+months
(a lot of committers with only few commits)

So yes, maybe not the right tool for that... Or at least would need more 
research in it...

Jacques

> 
> ----- "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: 
>> Interesting, notably the numbers of committers 
>> https://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=Open+For+Business+Project+%28Apache+OFBiz%29&project_1=OpenERP
>>  
>> Of course quantity is not quality, but it seems OpenERP has a better 
>> momentum than OFBiz, at the business level, I mean... 
>> Jacques 
> 
> -- 
> Ean Schuessler, CTO 
> e...@brainfood.com 
> 214-720-0700 x 315 
> Brainfood, Inc. 
> http://www.brainfood.com

Reply via email to