Me and Rupert have been looking at this as we've had this issue for a
while with specifically the Birth Date field - but any date only fields
will have this issue.
The birth date field is date only in ofbiz and in the database
java.sql.Date is returned from jdbc drivers when the field is SQL date,
the date will be set but the time will always be 00:00:00. The
java.sql.Date is only there to represent date only component of
java,util.Date (java.sql.Date overrides toString method to return only
the
date)
Because java.sql.Date extends java.util.Date and can be used in
DateFormat
class, applying a timezone with a negative offset will shift the day to
the
previous day because time is ALWAYS set to 00:00:00
This also occurs in freemarker if you convert a java.sql.Date to a
string
using syntax such as ${date?string} where date is a java.sql.Date
object. I
have created a fix in my fork at
https://github.com/gareth-carter/freemarker
*Gareth Carter *
*Software Development Analyst*
*Stannah Management Services Ltd*
*IT*
*Ext:*
7036
*Tel:*
01264 364311
*Fax:*
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Rupert Howell <ruperthow...@provolve.com>
To: "dev@ofbiz.apache.org" <dev@ofbiz.apache.org>
Date: 01/04/2014 09:27
Subject: Re: Birthday's Change
------------------------------
My birth date is my birth date wherever I am in the world - it is not
relative. My passport doesn't change as I travel through Timezones. Yet
if
I view my passport information is OFBiz it will change,
Dates need to be viewed as dates and be totally independent of
timezones. I
cannot think of a single reason why you would want to be specific with
dates. If you do want to be specific and have them change as to where
you
view them from - you'd just use Timestamps.
On 1 April 2014 09:12, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Rupert,
You are right when you don't want to be to specific. But if you are
specific and precise then a birthday needs to have a time zone
associated.
Remember it is not the birthday itself that shifts, but your
viewpoint of
it when changing locations (meaning time zones).
Regarding.
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmm.
Digging a bit deeper I see that birthday is persisted as a date. So
that
shouldn't be creating issues.
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Pierre Smits <
pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rupert,
A date should not be stored as a date-time, but as a date. This
appears
throughout the entire spectrum of apps where dates are intended.
Over
600
entity fields are designated as date-time, 18 entity fields are
designated
as date and 8 as time.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Rupert Howell <
ruperthow...@provolve.com>wrote:
There's a definite problem with the way the dates are displayed in
OFBiz.
If you enter a birthday with your local timezone set to UTC, then
change
the timezone to -12, the birthday changes to the previous day.
This
is
clearly wrong and is really apparent if you have your Server
Timezone
set
to GB. If the birthday is within BST (April - October) and you
are in
GMT
(Nov - March) they all appear incorrectly and vice versa.
Ultimately this is caused by line 977 UtilDateTime
f.setTimeZone(tz);
Can anyone think of a legitimate reason why a date would have a
timezone
applied? A date is a date. January 1st is January 1st no matter
where
in
the world you are. I would have thought if you want a date to be
timezone
dependent you'd use a Timestamp.
I could patch line 666 of ModelFormField but I think it would be
better
to
actually change the UtilDateTime method..
--
Rupert Howell
Provolve Ltd
Front Office, Deale House, 16 Lavant Street, Petersfield, GU32
3EW,
UK
t: 01730 267868 / m: 079 0968 5308
e: ruperthow...@provolve.com
w: http://www.provolve.com
--
Rupert Howell
Provolve Ltd
Front Office, Deale House, 16 Lavant Street, Petersfield, GU32 3EW, UK
t: 01730 267868 / m: 079 0968 5308
e: ruperthow...@provolve.com
w: http://www.provolve.com
This email is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain
privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy,
distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have
received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender.
Stannah Lift Holdings Ltd registered No. 686996, Stannah Management
Services Ltd registered No. 2483693, Stannah Lift Services Ltd
registered
No. 1189799, Stannah Microlifts Ltd registered No. 964804, Stannah Lifts
Ltd registered No. 1189836, Stannah Stairlifts Ltd registered No.
1401451.
All registered offices at Watt Close, East Portway, Andover, Hampshire,
SP10 3SD, England.
All Registered in England and Wales.
