On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Yes, so we need to define which are those components. So 3 points, which > should be discussed separately it seems, not sure of the order yet but > probably this one > 1) Components to move to Attic. They will be freezed but still available in > this state in Attic (in other words slowly dying) > 2) Components to disable. They will be maintained, but OOTB will not > interfere with other components (applications or other specialpurpose) > 3) Components to keep enabled. They must be maintained and have no > interactions with other components Components enabled and disabled must be maintained in the same way: it is not that a group is more important than the other. Also, disabling a component doesn't mean that it will not go in a release: we could have disabled components in releases and enabled components excluded from a release or vice versa. > > For the point 2 we need to clarify if it could applies to trunk also. I'd now > tend to avoid differences between trunk and branch releases, at the > functionality or other levels. I agree that the same settings should be maintained in the trunk and in the release branches. Jacopo
