On May 6, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> wrote:
> the workflow can be simple as is described in: > http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html > > we could use this as the MVP (minimum viable product) so mimic basically how > people use SVN and then slowly take advantage of the possibilities of GIT. > > Regards, > Hans Hans, I think you didn't spend enough time studying this material. The document you are referencing is what we already have: the workflow and infrastructure described are already in place: 1) a writable svn repo 2) a read only mirror in git: git://git.apache.org/ofbiz.git 3) Jira to submit patches Jacopo > > On 06/05/15 13:35, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> My vote is clearly stated: propose a Git workflow that is inline with the >> ASF policies and that is good for the OFBiz project and I will vote >> positively. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On May 6, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Then you better change your vote? At it is now, we cannot even create an >>> implementation proposal. >>> Hans >>> >>> On 06/05/15 13:22, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> On May 6, 2015, at 3:34 AM, Hans Bakker <h.bak...@antwebsystems.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It is no use, setting up an implementation plan when there is still a >>>>> possibility people will reject it. >>>> Ok, if this was your goal then it seems you got your answer: most people >>>> are inclined to Git (or will not object to it) but don't feel like it is >>>> actionable enough for a vote now: defining an implementation plan, so that >>>> people can understand how the actual every day work of the OFBiz community >>>> (committers, contributors and users) with Git will be, would definitely >>>> help. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >
