A) -1 B) 0 C) +1 Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > A) -1 > B) +0 > C) +1 (as I said at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699 > we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions > when using the "component://" notation (in screens) > > Jacques > > > Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit : > >> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity >> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to >> help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he >> won't waste his time. >> >> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files >> but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for >> the following naming space : >> > > A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/... >> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/... >> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C) >> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled >> Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that >> script because other script languages could be used in the future) >> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's >> message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq >> >> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1 >> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi >> >> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time ! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nicolas >> >>
