Hi Mridul, I'm assuming you want to split the methods, not copy-paste into a new file right? If yes then yeah I think It's a good idea.
Taher Alkhateeb On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Mridul Pathak < mridul.pat...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > The other area that I believe needs be fixed is the use of UtilProperties > for both configurations and UI Labels. UI Labels used to be in properties > files way back and at that time when migrating to XML format it made sense > to keep using the same methods for properties and UI Labels to minimize the > effort. I think handling of configurations versus UI Labels can be > redesigned to be distinct functionalities. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Mridul Pathak > Senior Manager > HotWax Systems > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > On Aug 8, 2016, at 10:56 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > However as far as configuration files are concerned, I find the whole > > approach currently used in OFBiz a bit confusing and problematic. There > are > > too many files scattered in too many places. Some of them are XML and > some > > are .properties. we should really have one or a few files preferrably in > > one directory for all configurations related to framework and core > > applications. Or maybe just one master configuration file for framework > and > > another one for applications and that's it. Also many configurations > should > > be code and vice versa. All of this makes tweking OFBiz confusing and > > difficult. > > > > So my real preference is to shake things up, redesign and centralize > > configurations for OFBiz. For example if you think of apache httpd, then > > it's really one or two major files isn't it? It should be similar with > us I > > think. > >
