Actually Pierre just followed
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
<<Other files may make sense to have no license header. Three examples are:
* Short informational text files; for example README, INSTALL files. The expectation
is that these files make it obvious which product they relate to.>>
That seems OK with me
Jacques
Le 01/09/2016 à 08:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, <jler...@apache.org> wrote:
...
Legal statements are not required in readme files, as per consensus in dev
mail thread with title 'Shorter ASL2 header in short files'. The mail
thread started here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/pc5bzrsiupef7xjt
Consensus? I was actually the only one to reply to your proposal and I
wrote:
"In my opinion we should include the full header, that is important
to comply with the ASF licenses policies, unless there is a strong reason
for not doing so.
[...]
By the way, my preference is, inline with what is mentioned in that
document, to "err on having a source header and contact legal-discuss@ if
unsure."
Jacopo
