> Of course there are real world users, did you see the references? Yes I saw them, what does that have to do with my last email?
> Do we have a such document for ecommerce? No, so It's not a good argument to not switch the demo from ecommerce to ecomseo. You're asking for opinions and I can't give one without any knowledge of this feature so I'm simply telling you that the lack of documentation is a hindrance to evaluation and adoption. I took a quick look at SeoConfig.xml and have no idea what most of it does. > Would you not like to have spiders bots continuously crawling it without any risk? I don't understand this question. > Replacing ecommerce by ecomseo is another matter, another step I'd say. It should have been the first step before any of this was committed but instead you pushed ahead and committed it as an alternative despite objections so now we have duplicated functionality and a messier codebase. I was going to list out the current set of possible SEO approaches that now exist in the codebase but it's all such an overlapping mess I can't make sense of it without spending too much time trying to figure it out. People need to stop adding things they can't get consensus on, IMO the mess that results is worse for the project than any missing feature. I'll never understand why some committers are so desperate to see something committed that they'll push forward at any cost. Not every feature has to start it's life in the OFBiz repo. > And I'm surprised that you prefer to have "/control/" in each URL by default :/ That is not the deciding factor in this discussion for me. I'm against any change to the status quo until we get this mess cleaned up. Regards Scott On 23 September 2016 at 20:34, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com > wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Of course there are real world users, did you see the references? > > Do we have a such document for ecommerce? No, so It's not a good argument > to not switch the demo from ecommerce to ecomseo. Would you not like to > have spiders bots continuously crawling it without any risk? > > Replacing ecommerce by ecomseo is another matter, another step I'd say. > > And I'm surprised that you prefer to have "/control/" in each URL by > default :/ > > Compare > https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org:8443/ecomseo > with > https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org:8443/ecommerce/control/main > > Jacques > > > > Le 23/09/2016 à 01:15, Scott Gray a écrit : > >> Well for me it's a -1 until I hear some positive reviews from other users >> (and ideally committers). I don't like having two ecommerce webapps and >> my >> preference would be to merge the two into one, but I can't promote that >> idea without any group consensus that the SEO approach is good and well >> architected. A document describing the architecture would make that much >> easier and I'm amazed one wasn't supplied with the proposal, no wonder it >> sat there without much attention for so long. But since one doesn't exist >> we'll just have to wait until people have time/care to review it and/or >> use >> it and provide feedback. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 23 September 2016 at 00:07, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com >> >>> wrote: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5312 >>> >>> More athttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2214?jql=project >>> %20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20text%20~%20%22seo%22 >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 22/09/2016 à 13:25, Scott Gray a écrit : >>> >>> By the way, is there any technical or user documentation for it? I >>>> haven't >>>> looked at it and don't have time to review the actual implementation >>>> right >>>> now. The link you provided doesn't offer much more than a sales pitch. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 22 September 2016 at 23:22, Scott Gray<scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This mostly to somehow battle test it, even if I know it works well >>>> >>>>> So does it need battle testing or does it work well? Have you deployed >>>>> it >>>>> to any production instances? Has anyone else? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On 19 September 2016 at 01:27, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you don't know about or did not try it, but we have ecomseo a >>>>>> clone >>>>>> of the ecommerce component tailored for SEO >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Search+Eng >>>>>> ine+Optimisation,+SEO+in+ecommerce >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose to use it as the default ecommerce demo. This mostly to >>>>>> somehow >>>>>> battle test it, even if I know it works well. >>>>>> >>>>>> As it's based on ecommerce, users should not experience a big changes, >>>>>> apart the changed URLs >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >
