Hi All,

Here are the meeting minutes from the discussion today with Imesha, and the 
discussion last week with Tom.


05/28 - GSOC Meeting [with Tom] (9 AM EST)

  *   Status
     *   I have created the DMB repository before the meeting as first step, 
and plan to add the dockerfile-maven plugin next.
  *   Discussion
     *   Set default docker image name to project build name and the default 
tag to project version
     *   Run the shell script for file manager in docker container and see fix 
errors.
     *   Also create a diagram indicating which components depend on the others 
so that others can benefit.
     *   Goal for the week is to get to a stage where dockerfile maven 
generates the docker image, and filemgr can run in it without errors


06/04 - GSOC Meeting [with Imesha] (9 AM EST)

  *   Status
     *   I created a dockerfile for filemgr and made a few changes to the 
filemgr script, so that filemgr start works inside docker as well. Now the 
maven build process generates a docker image from the dockerfile at the package 
phase, and I’m able to start it without encountering any issues.
  *   Discussion
     *   Instead of running the shell script, run the command directly in 
Dockerfile. Makes things easier.
     *   For the development purposes, create the docker images on the default 
build profile itself. Later move them to a separate profile.
     *   Once the image works and confirmed running well, discuss with others 
on which directories should be mounted in volumes.

There are also a few concerns that I forgot to discuss on today’s meeting which 
I want to mention.

  *   I saw that filemgr shell script inside radix is different from the one in 
core distribution. Is this intentional or is it a bug?
  *   I saw some plugin versions in pom files are beta (especially 
maven-assembly-plugin). Shouldn’t these be updated to non-beta versions?

Appreciate any suggestions on these.

Best Regards,
Yasith Jayawardana


On May 27, 2019, at 10:04 PM, Jayawardana, Yasith 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

[MEETING NOTES - 05/21/2019]


 *   As the first step of the project, create a new repository from the RADIX 
build.
 *   Customize it such that it creates Docker Images at “mvn install”, and 
publishes them to DockerHub at “mvn deploy”.
 *   To achieve this, the first component that should be containerized is OODT 
file manager, as it contains the least dependencies on other components of OODT.
 *   Maven assembly plugin is used at the "mvn build" stage. Therefore, the 
docker image creation should happen in a later stage. i.e. “mvn install” stage.
 *   Use the tar.gz file created from the maven assembly plugin as the source 
for generating the docker image for that component.
 *   The docker image creation should not be enabled by default, and should be 
designed as an optional output. User should be able to configure the 
credentials of DockerHub, etc somewhere in the build step.

Apologies for taking long to post this update.

[PROGRESS UPDATE]
So far, I created a new repository 
(https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fyasithmilinda%2Foodt-dmb&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyasith%40cs.odu.edu%7C562ed13a48344223267608d6e310e8ac%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C636946059106151479&amp;sdata=8DNciBssR3lnur1CEMiXuTJjqQxl1NZUd7XL6iN3cPg%3D&amp;reserved=0)
 to implement the project and add the additional build steps needed to 
create/publish docker images. As the implementation becomes stable, the 
changed/added files will be added/modified in OODT source code, and this repo 
could be used as an example implementation of it.


If there’s anything that I've misunderstood and/or needs to be changed, do let 
me know. Thanks!

Best,
Yasith

On May 14, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Tom Barber 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

Yasith, to get you off to a good start in terms of open source development.
Can you please file the issues you expect to work on in the short term in
Jira so we can track them. If you do it it’ll ensure that you have enough
knowledge rather than us doing it and them not making sense.

Tom


On 14 May 2019 at 15:12:43, Tom Barber 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>) 
wrote:

Just a quick recap from our call with Yasith earlier today:

Had a good chat with Yasith about how RADIX works and how people build out
OODT applications from RADIX (
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FOODT%2FRADiX%2BPowered%2BBy%2BOODT&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyasith%40cs.odu.edu%7C562ed13a48344223267608d6e310e8ac%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C636946059106151479&amp;sdata=9hbMVRs1dsT2PB08QFS69IYc88cgKWjzSTITUn%2B9Njg%3D&amp;reserved=0)

General Docker build plan is as follows:

* Users can deploy a standard RADIX build and optionally choose the Docker
profile at build time to build docker images from it
* Docker will be optional not standard
* RADIX will allow users to define the image tag names for easy tagging and
pushing to docker hub or similar
* In the GSOC version we will focus on single deployments of each component
not clustered up using ZK or similar we will stick that in the TODO list

Once built the end target is Kubernetes, both MiniKube and full Kubernetes.
Docker Compose may be used for interim testing and validation.

A few deploy methods exist for validation:

Standard deploy yams for K8S
Helm Chart
Or via a custom Kubernetes Operator similar to ArangoDB (
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Farangodb%2Fkube-arangodb&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyasith%40cs.odu.edu%7C562ed13a48344223267608d6e310e8ac%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C636946059106151479&amp;sdata=mt2pG%2BmMTcAd2FJuXtn%2FHwro090o4TBb6Um%2Fi1rzAvA%3D&amp;reserved=0)

--


Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number:
09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston
Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891.




All engagements
are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and its
contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed and
may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise
protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice
cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.


Reply via email to