> There are some steps needed to get enable people to contribute a project > and from what I have seen, not much on that front has been done here. Until > the project is setup (which basically still has not been done), there's no > much "community involvement" that can happen.
Another role for "management". Let me set up the project. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Yanik Grignon <[email protected]> wrote: > It's entirely unclear how we can contribute to the community. I made a > change and submitted a pull request against the github mirror of the Apache > git since I don't know how to connect to the Apache git. That pull request > has been merged by Pam into the Apache git repo. > > There are some steps needed to get enable people to contribute a project > and from what I have seen, not much on that front has been done here. Until > the project is setup (which basically still has not been done), there's no > much "community involvement" that can happen. > > Thanks! > > Yanik Grignon > Product Owner & Architect > Salesforce > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:46 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:45 PM David Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've been ignoring this because my hands are tied for trying to help > it. > > > But can we try moving to new management? Can I be put in charge? > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused by your statements. Who is management in this case? > > Your employer? The ASF? Why are your hands tied for trying to help? > > > > ASF projects have no one in charge of them. TLPs get a VP, whose main > > responsibility is keeping the project running. > > > > > > > > > > Send me links to the right resources and give me the credentials to > make > > > things happen, and I might be able to recover it. > > > > > > > I'm not sure what recover it means. A community of 1 isn't a community. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 3:25 PM Farasath Ahamed <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > On Apr 19, 2016 2:41 AM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Hadrian > > > > > > > > > > On 04/17/2016 11:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> All, > > > > >> > > > > >> This is a formal vote to retire the OpenAz podling. This vote is > > the > > > > >> second step in the retirement process and is used as an indicator > to > > > the > > > > >> IPMC about whether to retire the podling, as the final decision > lies > > > > with > > > > >> the Incubator. > > > > >> > > > > >> Unless one of the mentors wants to take it on, if the vote passes > > here > > > > and > > > > >> on the IPMC list, I can take care of the retirement process (as > > > > described > > > > >> at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html ). > > > > >> > > > > >> This vote will be open for 72 hours via lazy consensus. > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> > > > > >> John > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
