Pam, this was your baby from the beginning. There's no one more qualified to be involved! I think we just need to add more committers. I also noticed your email was never answered. Hopefully this thread will put some light on the issue and get it resolved!
Now I do think if you're going to have time constraints, it's important to not to block other activities. So I'd like you to consider at least submitting one or more delegates for any mission critical roles you may have with the project. Also, who produces the reports they want? Do we need to come up with a report to get current with project management folks? On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:09 AM, DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) < [email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > I¹m willing to continue working on the project as a committer. I know the > source code and can handle the Jira management and contribute website > content. Would love to have more committers on it to help out. > > I posted a couple of question/issues on 3/17/16 that no one responded to. > I expected at least something from a mentor to help guide me on > determining why 3rd fork pull isn¹t being reflected on the mirror. The > other open issues I would think other folks should speak up and give their > opinion on so we can move toward a release. > > So I¹m not sure if this is really going to happen. But if it does great. > > Thanks, > > Pam > > On 4/20/16, 4:51 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I've also made quite a few commits to OpenAz, even though I'm a mentor, so > >not sure if I should be counted as a committer or not ;-) > > > >Rebooting the PMC could work, but I think we need at least 4 or 5 people > >willing to state that they will be actively working on the project. It > >would be helpful as well if they could state what it is they would > >actually > >work on. > > > >Colm. > > > >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:06 AM, David Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Okay. Let's do that. We just need Pam to sign off, right? > >> > >> And is anyone else following this chain willing to be a committer? I > >>have a > >> few more interested people myself, but I'd like to know what I'm working > >> with. > >> On Apr 19, 2016 6:16 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > Le 20/04/16 01:23, John D. Ament a écrit : > >> > > Hi David, > >> > > > >> > > Quite a long list of emails you've sent. Not saying its a bad > >>thing, > >> but > >> > > just getting caught up on them. > >> > > > >> > > So, looking at OpenAz's proposal, you're not listed as an initial > >> > > committer. You would have needed to be invited as a committer on > >>the > >> > > project. > >> > > > >> > > At this point, the existing PPMC seems to have disbanded. There > >>would > >> be > >> > > nothing stopping someone from forking on github and creating a > >>separate > >> > > project to continue on OpenAz, but as a different name. > >> > > >> > I would suggest another - and simpler - path : > >> > - gather a few volunteers, and take over the project. > >> > > >> > I was expecting that the initial podling members would take care of > >> > that, but beside Pam, there is *no* activity from the list of initial > >> > committers : > >> > > >> > # Rich Levinson > >> > # Hal Lockhart > >> > # Prateek Mishra > >> > # David Laurance > >> > # Duanhua Tu > >> > # Ajith Nair > >> > # Srijith Nair > >> > # Chris Rath > >> > > >> > So here, I would suggest to reboot this list of committers. That would > >> > require the agreement of the podling PMC, of course. The best person > >>to > >> > get that done would obviously be Pam. > >> > > >> > Note that it would require a massive effort to get the project > >>survive, > >> > by agregating some new committers : you need to be at least 3, but > >>that > >> > would be the bare minimum. Expecting to get out of incubation with > >>only > >> > 3 *active* committers is more than optimistic... > >> > > >> > Keep in mind that The ASF is all about building a community, that > >>would > >> > guarantee that the project will survive the natural leave of some > >> > committers in the ling run. If a project can't gather enough > >>committers, > >> > then the ASF is simply not the right place for it. > >> > > >> > If this can't work, then, yes, forking is probably the solution. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > >Talend Community Coder > >http://coders.talend.com > >
