I agree, the same thing did happen a few months back. The difference is we're going to be adding committers. And we need a semi-regular check in to see who's still with us. Lack of communication is killing this.
Also, is there a calendar of when we need to produce project deliverables, like those reports? On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: > 4 is a sufficient start if work is done. If anybody is doing work he/she > should be and will be voted in as a committer, not a problem. > > However, the same conversation took place a few months back and nothing > happened. The question is how should this vote be closed? John, since you > started it, do you have an opinion? > > Hadrian > > > On 04/20/2016 11:15 AM, David Ash wrote: > >> Good to hear from you Sam! (He's one of the 3 I mentioned that I could >> get >> involved) >> >> And it sounds like we have Pam as well. :-D >> >> So our list so far: >> >> Pam >> Sam >> Colm >> David >> >> That's 4. I am hoping at least one of the other two people I've messaged >> will be willing to join in, which will put us at 5. And there were some >> previous people involved in the discussion last time talk of retiring >> openaz was discussed. >> >> Is Carlos Perez still around and willing to be involved? >> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Sam Barrett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I'm willing to help work on the website, help with task management in >>> Jira*, documentation, devops, work on builds, be a member of the project >>> management committee, debug anything that needs to be fixed, and do >>> anything else I can to put out a release. >>> >>> *Do we have to use Jira, or can we use Trello instead? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam >>> >>> >>
