John, I agree both 1 & 2 are vital for continued success. Timely communication is absolutely key to success.
You laid out some tasks: 1) Podling status page update 2) Note sent to [email protected] to reflect new status 3) Podling reports for 3 months Can we assign those to someone? Or preferably, could [someone that can do them / the right person] like to publically volunteer and provide a due date? I hate to keep people accountable but ... well, actually I do like to keep people accountable. Also on that topic, can we get a due date for voting in new commiters? On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Hadrian, > > With my IPMC hat on, I'd like to recommend that: > > 1. The mentors need to stay active. They need to be responsive to both the > community and the PPMC in play here. > > 2. The PPMC, the new PPMC if it so would, also needs to be very responsive > to questions from the IPMC. > > With that said, if a reboot is what is wanted and enough people can get it > done, I'd say go for it. I would like to make sure that the podling status > page is updated, and that a note be sent over to [email protected] to reflect > the new status. I'd like to also plan to keep the podling on monthly > reports for 3 months to make sure efforts are continued forward. > > John > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:21 AM Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 4 is a sufficient start if work is done. If anybody is doing work he/she > > should be and will be voted in as a committer, not a problem. > > > > However, the same conversation took place a few months back and nothing > > happened. The question is how should this vote be closed? John, since > > you started it, do you have an opinion? > > > > Hadrian > > > > On 04/20/2016 11:15 AM, David Ash wrote: > > > Good to hear from you Sam! (He's one of the 3 I mentioned that I could > > get > > > involved) > > > > > > And it sounds like we have Pam as well. :-D > > > > > > So our list so far: > > > > > > Pam > > > Sam > > > Colm > > > David > > > > > > That's 4. I am hoping at least one of the other two people I've > messaged > > > will be willing to join in, which will put us at 5. And there were > some > > > previous people involved in the discussion last time talk of retiring > > > openaz was discussed. > > > > > > Is Carlos Perez still around and willing to be involved? > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Sam Barrett <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I'm willing to help work on the website, help with task management in > > >> Jira*, documentation, devops, work on builds, be a member of the > project > > >> management committee, debug anything that needs to be fixed, and do > > >> anything else I can to put out a release. > > >> > > >> *Do we have to use Jira, or can we use Trello instead? > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Sam > > >> > > > > > >
