I agree. I'd like to get that election started as soon as possible as well. I'm not sure how we do that, though. And I'm pretty sure I'm not involved in the election, except as a candidate for committer.
Considering your comment, should this be updated to take those comments into consideration? On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Comments inline... > > > Le 27/04/16 18:13, David Ash a écrit : > > The following is my thoughts on what the report could include, where I > have > > input. Areas where I don't know status / lack information is highlighted > > in yellow: > > > > ------ > > > > OpenAz > > > > OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the > > development of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a > > variety of languages. In general the work is at least consistent with > > or actually conforming to the OASIS XACML Standard. > > > > OpenAZ has been incubating since 01-2015. > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. Increasing community involvement: We are focusing on getting > information > > published on the website to aid the acquisition and orientation of new > > contributors, > > as well increasing the number of committers, in order to reduce > individual > > member > > workload, reduce reliance on any particular member, and to increase > project > > velocity. > > Note : we have potential new committers, but we *HAVE* to vote them in. > I woudl really like to see this vote being started asap. > > > > > 2. Merging the source code from AT&T, JP Morgan and Oracle and creating > > POM¹s. AT&T and JP Morgan source code has been merged and POM¹s created, > > it needs uploading into the Apache repository. > > > > 3. Get our first release done. > > > > [NOTE: I don't know whether this is done: "Get ICLA¹s from all the > > committers. > As we just are rebooting the project, the simplest would be to list the > potential active committers and the current active committers, and check > if their ICLA are present. But the first step is to list the active > committers/potential committers. > > > > So far AT&T and JP Morgan have done, but Oracle is taking more time."] > > > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > There have been multiple slowdowns and votes toward retiring the > project. > > Though we have a small team and there has been less than ideal > community > > involvement, we have recently increased the number of active members > and > > are directing focused efforts towards increasing community involvement. > > Active members are those who have been voted committers. This is still > to be done. > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > We have recently added a few members to the contributors list, and hope > > to be adding new committers soon. > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > We have merged in a port of the administrative portion of AT&T's > > contributed > > code, which was the last remaining piece of that code base. More work > > needs > > to be done on this front, but it's a major part of the code base and > this > > is a good > > start toward making it happen. > > > > We have also merged a fix for configuration and policy files, which > > updated > > class names and removed duplicate xml declarations from policy files. > > > > Date of last release: > > > > N/A > > > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > > > [NOTE: I do not know anything about this] > No new committers elected so far :-) But I hope this will change ! > > > > > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ] Paul Fremantle > > [ ] Emmanuel Lécharny > > [ ] Colm O hEigeartaigh > > [ ] Hadrian Zbarcea > > Thanks David for the effort ! It's esactly what the report should contain. > > Emmanuel > > >
