> I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure.
I'm ok with this. On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, at 09:15, tison wrote: > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. > > This is doable and actually what Kvrocks does during its graduation. > We can regard this round as a chance to review our > contributors/committers and nominate them if desired. > > If this is the consensus, we can make an explicit agreement. > > Best, > tison. > > Chojan Shang <[email protected]> 于2023年11月18日周六 21:16写道： >> >> I wholeheartedly endorse Xuanwo's perspective. >> >> Let's promote actively involved committers as PMC members, recognizing their >> recent contributions. Instead of promoting committers solely based on our >> transition to TLP, let's emphasize their increased responsibilities and >> active involvement in project governance. This approach aligns with our >> commitment to fostering a culture of collaboration. >> >> This move marks an exciting milestone in our path towards becoming a TLP. >> >> Best regards, >> PsiACE >> >> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on the >> > members of the PMC[1]. >> > >> > Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All >> > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. >> > >> > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP >> > PMC unless there is a certain issue. >> > >> > And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. >> > >> > Best, >> > tison. >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 >> > -- Xuanwo
