Ok, proposal? Le 17 juil. 2012 15:46, "dsh" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Well my way of thinking about this is if there's is enough buy-in > amongst the community in regards to using another build infrastructure > I would welcome using such an additional infrastructure. If there's > not enough buy-in we may face the same effect as it comes along with > our Jenkins and Buildbot builds which is that only a few people are > able to maintain it... > > PS: Buy-in == Willingness to take care of such an additional > infrastructure and actually use it frequently. > > Cheers > Daniel > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > was thinking of java 6/ java 7 feature > > > > will be/is a pain on jenkins or buildbot > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/7/17 dsh <[email protected]> > > > >> Shouldn't we try to stabilize our buildbot builds first (e.g. windoze) > >> before fiddling with new, and maybe exciting technology? > >> > >> Cheers > >> Daniel > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > didnt use cloudbees enough to know if it handles it correctly, > >> > > >> > here the point is not only CI but more platform validation. Travis is > >> > designed for it, not jenkins > >> > > >> > - Romain > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/7/17 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> ahem... [CloudBees hat] https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/ [/CloudBees > >> hat] > >> >> > >> >> On 17 July 2012 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > do you know http://travis-ci.org/ ? > >> >> > > >> >> > since we are proxied on github it should be easy to get builds on > >> travis > >> >> > and a nice feature is to be able to compile against matrix config > >> (java > >> >> > version, platform...) > >> >> > > >> >> > wdyt? > >> >> > > >> >> > - Romain > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >
