another thought: why not using jca? wdyt?
- Romain 2012/7/21 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > i'd prefer a proxy in front of any datasource > > - Romain > > > > 2012/7/21 David Blevins <[email protected]> > >> Poking Dain, hoping he can give some feedback. Dain was the one who >> added the JTA support to DBCP when we needed it. It was a pretty decent >> undertaking then. I.e. didn't fit terribly well. >> >> Redoing that in the Tomcat connection pooling might be possible. >> Anything that uses the java.util.concurrent libraries is likely way better. >> >> >> -David >> >> On Jul 21, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> > FYI using dbcp JTA part with a tomcat-jdbc backend pool is a bad idea we >> > loose a lot of benefit of tomcat-jdbc and code is not clean. >> > >> > next idea is to either find a way to contribute to commons-dbcp tomcat >> > features or to let our DataSourceFactory create simple datasources and >> > manage ourself JTA link (= all manageddatasoruce stuff of commons dbcp >> from >> > our own code with proxies) >> > >> > wdyt? >> > >> > - Romain >> > >> > >> > 2012/7/21 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> > >> >> Do we try to use tomcat dbcp in tomee? It misses jta features. >> >> >> >> >
