+1 on the idea but Romain pointed to a main point which is the technical
implications when it comes to stg like module names and package names, etc

I would say core code should still be openejb and code solely related to
tomee should be renamed

another point that is raised on the other thread of project renaming which
raised by some one who is using and heavily depending on tomee wouldn't
that affect them ?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Nov 13, 2012 4:11 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +0 since OpenEJB stays OpenEJB as it is today (i wouldn't rename all
> openejb module for that!)
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/13 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>
> > Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
> > discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
> >
> > There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in
terms
> > of our primary identity -- "the website says TomEE in letters as big as
my
> > hand" was one quote.  This was many months ago and my feedback then was
> > we're still experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out.
> >
> > It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially certified.
> >  The popularity is skyrocketing with no signs of slowing.  As TomEE
> > eclipses OpenEJB it becomes more and more strange to call the TLP
OpenEJB
> > given our website says TomEE all over it and that's all we present at
> > conferences.
> >
> > What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to