It shouldnt need any commit on trunk for me...
Le 13 nov. 2012 19:12, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> +1 on the idea but Romain pointed to a main point which is the technical
> implications when it comes to stg like module names and package names, etc
>
> I would say core code should still be openejb and code solely related to
> tomee should be renamed
>
> another point that is raised on the other thread of project renaming which
> raised by some one who is using and heavily depending on tomee wouldn't
> that affect them ?
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
> Apologies for any typos
> On Nov 13, 2012 4:11 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +0 since OpenEJB stays OpenEJB as it is today (i wouldn't rename all
> > openejb module for that!)
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/13 David Blevins <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
> > > discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
> > >
> > > There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in
> terms
> > > of our primary identity -- "the website says TomEE in letters as big as
> my
> > > hand" was one quote.  This was many months ago and my feedback then was
> > > we're still experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out.
> > >
> > > It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially
> certified.
> > >  The popularity is skyrocketing with no signs of slowing.  As TomEE
> > > eclipses OpenEJB it becomes more and more strange to call the TLP
> OpenEJB
> > > given our website says TomEE all over it and that's all we present at
> > > conferences.
> > >
> > > What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE?
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to