[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564141#action_12564141
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-477:
-----------------------------------------
I still do not understand why BrokerImpl needed changes; could you explain the
changes there in more detail? I'm concerned that if the BrokerImpl needs
extension to detect whether or not an instance is a member of the current
working set, then other things could get out of sync as well.
> making StoreManager more flexible and extensible.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-477
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: kernel
> Affects Versions: 1.0.2
> Reporter: Daniel Lee
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: OPENJPA-477-trunk612523.patch, OPENJPA-477.613332.patch
>
>
> The OpenJPA StoreManager needs some modifications to make it more flexible
> and extensible. For example, some private methods and attributes need to
> made either public or protected. The attached patch identifies the areas
> that have been identified thus far. Please let me know if there are any
> concerns. Many thanks in advance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
