[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-1015:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: OPENJPA-1015-audit-output.patch

Patch which turns on auditing output, so we know which file failed the check.
Causes output listing the failing file(s), like -

[INFO] [checkstyle:checkstyle {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting audit...
/Users/drwoods/openjpa/trunk/openjpa-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/sql/DB2Dictionary.java:848:
 Line is longer than 80 characters.
Audit done.

[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] An error has occurred in Checkstyle report generation.

Embedded error: There are 1 checkstyle errors.


> Enforce 80-column line width for source code
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1015
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1015
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Pinaki Poddar
>            Assignee: B.J. Reed
>         Attachments: line80.txt, OPENJPA-1015-audit-output.patch, 
> OPENJPA-1015-checkstyle.xml.patch, OPENJPA-1015-max80chars.patch, 
> OPENJPA-1015-newlineendoffile.patch, TestLineWidth.java
>
>
> There used to be a rule of 80-column width for source code.
> That rule is slowly yielding. 
> Should we add a test case to catch such violation?
> Or should we not reignite the age-old battle about line width, placement of 
> brackets etc?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to