Hi Francesco, I will not have much time these days to help very actively but i'd expose it the other way around, more roadmap oriented:
OpenJPA 3.0.0: provides stored procedure support of JPA 2.1 etc... cause structurally we are more about adding features one by one than saying "we just miss X and Y" for now - which is fine IMHO but just trying to explain why we must not reference ourself to JPA 2.2 completeness but more on a kind of timeline. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 11:43, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> a écrit : > Hi all, > a recent conversation on Twitter [1] with Oliver Drotbohm, Spring Data > project lead, highlighted the need to clarify what is the JPA spec level > implemented by the various OpenJPA releases; for such a purpose, [2] was > opened. > > I personally believe it is quite important to timely react, and I also > offer my availability to align the various docs, if no one else steps > in; for such a purpose, however, I would really appreciate some kind of > draft statements like as follows: > > * OpenJPA 2.x - fully implements JPA 2.0 specs, pass JPA TCK > * OpenJPA 3.0.0 - depends on JPA 2.1 specs, JPA TCK not available at > release time - missing JPA 2.1 features: A,B,C... > * OpenJPA 3.0.1 - not released yet, depends on JPA 2.2 specs, JPA TCK > compliance not yet verified - missing JPA 2.2 features: D,E,F... > > WDYT? > Regards. > > [1] https://twitter.com/odrotbohm/status/1081713555290972160 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2765 > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
