Hi all,
sorry to bother, but I think we should fix the communication anytime soon: I understand that Mark's statement below means that we will be soon able to report exactly what's the compatibility status of 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT, but what about 3.0.0? I know it depends on JPA 2.1 specs, but can someone briefly highlight what is missing (and / or what is implemented)?

Regards.

On 07/01/19 12:02, Mark Struberg wrote:
I've gradually improved our test coverage and internal code parts by adding 
docker profiles for multiple Databases over the last months.
I did add Oracle11_XE yesterday. Although the setup is not yet perfect we can 
at least run the tests now.

So basically everyone can now test against a bunch of different databases.

The next step will be to include the JakartaEE JPA TCK.

And then we will know exactly what's missing.

LieGrue,
strub


Am 07.01.2019 um 11:47 schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>:

On 07/01/19 11:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Francesco,

I will not have much time these days to help very actively but i'd expose
it the other way around, more roadmap oriented:

OpenJPA 3.0.0: provides stored procedure support of JPA 2.1 etc...

cause structurally we are more about adding features one by one than saying
"we just miss X and Y" for now - which is fine IMHO but just trying to
explain why we must not reference ourself to JPA 2.2 completeness but more
on a kind of timeline.
I understand, that's fine; I would still need to fill up the statements above 
for both 3.0.0 and 3.0.1: would you be able to provide those?

Regards.

Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 11:43, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>
a écrit :

Hi all,
a recent conversation on Twitter [1] with Oliver Drotbohm, Spring Data
project lead, highlighted the need to clarify what is the JPA spec level
implemented by the various OpenJPA releases; for such a purpose, [2] was
opened.

I personally believe it is quite important to timely react, and I also
offer my availability to align the various docs, if no one else steps
in; for such a purpose, however, I would really appreciate some kind of
draft statements like as follows:

* OpenJPA 2.x - fully implements JPA 2.0 specs, pass JPA TCK
* OpenJPA 3.0.0 - depends on JPA 2.1 specs, JPA TCK not available at
release time - missing JPA 2.1 features: A,B,C...
* OpenJPA 3.0.1 - not released yet, depends on JPA 2.2 specs, JPA TCK
compliance not yet verified - missing JPA 2.2 features: D,E,F...

WDYT?
Regards.

[1] https://twitter.com/odrotbohm/status/1081713555290972160
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2765

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to