+1000 to make it part of the dictionary, makes way more sense IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 21 janv. 2019 à 15:53, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > hi folks! > Over the last few days I started to implement the Java8 time types which > are required by the JPA-2.2 spec. > * LocalDate* LocalTime* LocalDateTime* OffsetTime* OffsetDateTime > The first 3 are pretty much finished. Will work on the later 2 today.I > first started to implement LocalDate as ValueHandler. But some databases > (postgres, etc) do have native support for those types. So I figured it > might be better to add support for it directly in the DBDictionary. This > also improves performance. > Wdyt?Any input or ideas how to make it better? > > LieGrue,strub >
