Thanks for that, will try to test LocalDate support in our project later this week :)
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 00:00, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > On 21/01/19 16:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > +1000 to make it part of the dictionary, makes way more sense IMHO > > +1001 then, I also think it's better :-) > > Thanks Mark! > Regards. > > > Le lun. 21 janv. 2019 à 15:53, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > a > > écrit : > > > >> hi folks! > >> Over the last few days I started to implement the Java8 time types which > >> are required by the JPA-2.2 spec. > >> * LocalDate* LocalTime* LocalDateTime* OffsetTime* OffsetDateTime > >> The first 3 are pretty much finished. Will work on the later 2 today.I > >> first started to implement LocalDate as ValueHandler. But some databases > >> (postgres, etc) do have native support for those types. So I figured it > >> might be better to add support for it directly in the DBDictionary. This > >> also improves performance. > >> Wdyt?Any input or ideas how to make it better? > >> > >> LieGrue,strub > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
