Hi JL, Looks accurate to me done with javax on master (and likely properly rewritten in our relocation/jakarta artifact).
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 25 mai 2021 à 15:12, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > In order to pass TCK for TomEE, I had to patch OpenJPA to avoid side > effects with other providers such as EclipseLink for instance. > > The change I made makes sense to be included in OpenJPA in my opinion. > But I'd like to gather some thoughts for this change > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakarta/commit/4d579785f7554c59b83d0060ec8c1ead81385738#diff-1aba75a7cc55951fb938c64a533fc9de63c3139b3aec5cf1279a96394d910b1e > > I can create a JIRA ticket and submit a PR to OpenJPA if you guys think it > makes sense. > In essence it prevents OpenJPA from doing something when a JPA provider is > explicitly specified. > > It will only do something if no JPA provider is specified or if OpenJPA is > the JPA provider configured. > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com >
