Created the small PR with a very simplistic test.
https://github.com/apache/openjpa/pull/80

Looks like 2 methods are failing. Do you have some ideas?

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:37 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Awesome. Thanks Romain
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 4:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Le mar. 25 mai 2021 à 15:41, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> > I'll create a ticket then and checkout master to contribute it.
>> > We can discuss after how I can help in the jakarka version of it
>> >
>>
>> While a string which ends up in the constant pool the relocation we have
>> in
>> place should do it for you, just needs to ensure it worked to avoid
>> surprises but I don't expect any action except "validation" one.
>>
>>
>> > --
>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi JL,
>> > >
>> > > Looks accurate to me done with javax on master (and likely properly
>> > > rewritten in our relocation/jakarta artifact).
>> > >
>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Le mar. 25 mai 2021 à 15:12, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
>> > > >
>> > > a écrit :
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > In order to pass TCK for TomEE, I had to patch OpenJPA to avoid side
>> > > > effects with other providers such as EclipseLink for instance.
>> > > >
>> > > > The change I made makes sense to be included in OpenJPA in my
>> opinion.
>> > > > But I'd like to gather some thoughts for this change
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakarta/commit/4d579785f7554c59b83d0060ec8c1ead81385738#diff-1aba75a7cc55951fb938c64a533fc9de63c3139b3aec5cf1279a96394d910b1e
>> > > >
>> > > > I can create a JIRA ticket and submit a PR to OpenJPA if you guys
>> think
>> > > it
>> > > > makes sense.
>> > > > In essence it prevents OpenJPA from doing something when a JPA
>> provider
>> > > is
>> > > > explicitly specified.
>> > > >
>> > > > It will only do something if no JPA provider is specified or if
>> OpenJPA
>> > > is
>> > > > the JPA provider configured.
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to