They have moved to git less than a month ago :) I was going to update our build to use EGit but had no time for this :(( I'll check the EGit (or will ask it's developers) if it can clone/update to the specific git revision.
Tags will work as long as we will stay on the release :) Additionally we can fork their repo and stay on the revision we need, but I would avoid this if possible. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:31 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > What concerns me most is currently the red5 server process cpu while > recording. > "5) red5 version was more or less up to date in the trunk (4756)," > Trunk is doing a Git checkout, so our old system using red5 revision > numbers is not applicable anymore. > I think the build.xml should be changed so that it does not checkout HEAD > of https://github.com/Red5/red5-server.git, instead it should checkout a > tag. I will ask the red5-devs to create a tag. I wonder why they did not do > that in case they do a release or major milestone. > > Sebastian > > > > > > 2014-03-17 0:16 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: > > > Detailed answers: > > > > 1) there is now a FPS per second changer. How does that incorporate with > > the recordings produced? > > Video frames are now being captured using constant delay timer task (with > > the FPS based delay) > > If none frames are ready to be sent, "no_change" frame is sended > > > > 2) Is the audio and the video in sync no matter what FPS I choose? > > I believe so, Vasiliy has tested it and found no issues (if I'm not > > mistaken), additional testing might be required > > > > 3) Did anybody monitor the red5 server process CPU while doing a > > screen-sharing > > recording? > > No, we can perform such testing > > > > 4) CPU usage jumps to 100% whenever I start recording. > > I can also see lots of statements similar to this in the log output: > > [INFO] [NioProcessor-4] org.red5.server.stream.codec.ScreenVideo - > > Allocating memory for 748 compressed blocks. > > I believe this is caused by creating CachedEvent and copy byte buffers > > > > 5) red5 version was more or less up to date in the trunk (4756), > currently > > trunk is updated to the latest git version (need to be additionaly > > tested/fixed) > > a) client and server versions should be fixed (or we will have build > > broken or unstable one day) > > b) screen sharing is broken (need to be investigated/fixed) > > c) up to r4756 red5 server was unstable while video is published this > > should be tested more carefully > > > > 6) I think there is also a need to do it because partially some > ressources > > are no more available in the SVN repository > > We have all necessary resources in our repocitory (just in case) > > > > 7) We could also consider downloading red5 server/client from Jenkins > > I don't think it is good idea since we don't need HEAD version all the > time > > I'm trying to rewrite our build to be maven based (not very successful so > > far) so I guess things will change a lot if this step will be > implemented. > > Until then I would leave the build as it is now > > > > 8) My red5 CPU load is also fine as long as I don't record something. > > I'll try to double check on my machines > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:06 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > My red5 CPU load is also fine as long as I don't record something. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sebastian > > > On 16 Mar 2014 19:38, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > trunk is building red5 using maven already > > > > I'll review the code and merge compilation from the trunk. > > > > > > > > red5 was not updated in 3.0.x branch since video calls were broken > > (still > > > > broken in trunk, will check the release) > > > > > > > > I have not monitored server CPU, but it seems to be ~1% on my machine > > > > > > > > Will double check and provide detailed answers to all of your > questions > > > > later today :) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Btw: We could also consider downloading red5 server/client from > > > Jenkins: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Red5-server/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/target/red5-server-1.0.2-M1-server.zip > > > > > > > > > > Although integrating Git and Maven build into ANT is also possible. > > > > > > > > > > What is the preference ? > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-03-16 18:51 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/r1577984 does fix to do a Git checkout > > using > > > > the > > > > > > latest code from their repository and for the client and server. > > > > > > The folder structure is slightly different, needs some further > > > > > adjustments. > > > > > > Also I think some of the patches (Tomcat7 patch) is no more > > required > > > as > > > > > > the latest red5 is already using Tomcat 7. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have created a ticket to capture the progress: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-950 > > > > > > It will require some more work and review before this piece of > work > > > is > > > > > > ready to be merged back to any of the other branches. > > > > > > > > > > > > However I think it might be useful for our CPU issues and moving > > > > forward. > > > > > > Getting rid of the Tomcat7 patches and SVN-kit checkout stuff > seems > > > to > > > > > make > > > > > > our life also a little bit easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-03-16 17:19 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > I think there is also a need to do it because partially some > > > ressources > > > > > >> are no more available in the SVN repository: > > > > > >> http://red5.googlecode.com/svn/java/client/readme.txt > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 2014-03-16 15:25 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I also tried updating to the latest release of Red5 (1.0.2 seems > > to > > > be > > > > > >>> just released). > > > > > >>> I was more or less successful. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> When using red5 in its latest version the CPU usage when doing > a > > > > screen > > > > > >>> sharing of the red5 server side process is a lot less. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I can see that there are a couple of issues updating to the > > latest > > > > red5 > > > > > >>> versions. However letting them too much out of sync was always > > > > > difficult in > > > > > >>> the past as there are regularly changes that you need to > > duplicate > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > >>> OpenMeetings API/Configuration files et cetera. And of course > > > > > regression > > > > > >>> testing is a pain. > > > > > >>> However we rely on the improvements of the red5 server API. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> What is the current status of the red5 version? Our version > r4393 > > > is > > > > > >>> from 07/2012 ( > > https://code.google.com/p/red5/source/detail?r=4393) > > > > :) > > > > > >>> We should make a move I think. There seems to be maybe a good > > point > > > > now > > > > > >>> when there is a new stable release to review a migration to the > > > > latest > > > > > >>> version. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> What do you think? > > > > > >>> What are the current show stoppers from upgrading to the latest > > > red5 > > > > > >>> version? > > > > > >>> I can see a couple of issues when upgrading, but it seems there > > is > > > no > > > > > >>> major incompatibility between OpenMeetings and later Red5 > > versions. > > > > > Spring > > > > > >>> is now 4.0 in red5. And some minor changes in the red5-web.xml. > > > > > >>> And it seems like the .upload servlet is not correctly > > initialized. > > > > > >>> I can share my upgraded OpenMeetings instance if anybody is > > > > interested. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Sebastian > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> 2014-03-16 14:28 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>> : > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Regarding the Red5 CPU usage: I did a couple of tests. It does > > not > > > > seem > > > > > >>>> to be like previously a writer problem (writer too slow to > write > > > > > packets to > > > > > >>>> disk). Even if I comment out the stream listeners so that > > nothing > > > > > will be > > > > > >>>> written to disk the CPU usage jumps to 100% whenever I start > > > > > recording. > > > > > >>>> I can also see lots of statements similar to this in the log > > > output: > > > > > >>>> [INFO] [NioProcessor-4] > > org.red5.server.stream.codec.ScreenVideo - > > > > > >>>> Allocating memory for 748 compressed blocks. > > > > > >>>> [INFO] [NioProcessor-4] > > org.red5.server.stream.codec.ScreenVideo - > > > > > >>>> Allocating memory for 1305 compressed blocks. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have not seen this kind of logging output in past versions > of > > > > red5. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Sebastian > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> 2014-03-16 12:44 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> >: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> there is now a FPS per second changer. How does that > > incorporate > > > > with > > > > > >>>>> the recordings produced? Is the audio and the video in sync > no > > > > > matter what > > > > > >>>>> FPS I choose? > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Did anybody monitor the red5 server process CPU while doing a > > > > > >>>>> screen-sharing recording? I can still see the CPU jump to > 100% > > of > > > > the > > > > > >>>>> server process if I start a recording. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> It would be really good to have a demo server instead of > doing > > > this > > > > > >>>>> local verification. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>> Sebastian > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>> Sebastian Wagner > > > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > >>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > >>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > >>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > >>>> Sebastian Wagner > > > > > >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > >>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > >>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > >>> Sebastian Wagner > > > > > >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > >>> http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > >>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> Sebastian Wagner > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > >> http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Sebastian Wagner > > > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sebastian Wagner > > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > WBR > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > seba.wag...@gmail.com > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
