Jörn, to avoid ambiguity in case you addressed me to propose a WSD interface. I'd prefer Anthony to come up with a proposal, because he is closer to the multiple WSD algorithms that would be nice to include in the analysis.
Aliaksandr On 16 February 2015 at 15:19, Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:09 +0100, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote: > > Since you're perhaps deeper in this that others you seem to be the > > best > > candidate to make a proposal, to check the state of the art algorithms > > and > > devise general enough interface for all or most of them. One way could > > be > > to see what the algorithms typically require, how diverse are sources > > of > > senses (WordNet alone has multiple different interfaces to access it), > > which options do the algorithms take and start somewhere there to see > > that > > the interface is flexible enough to accommodate that diversity, has > > ability > > to do some built-in checks (such as detecting the case of algorithm > > trained > > on one source of senses working with another, or perhaps algorithm > > relying > > on a relation which is missing in the sense source) and be similar to > > the > > rest of OpenNLP. We might even end up with two interfaces (e.g. for > > sense > > provider and for WSD itself). > > > > What do you think about this way? > > Please propose an interface. We will discuss it here on the list. > > Jörn > >
