Hi,
Concerning this point, I would like to ask about BabelNet [1].The advantages of 
[1] is that it integrates WordNet, Wikipedia, Wiktionary, OmegaWiki, Wikidata, 
and Open Multi-WordNet.
Also, the newest SemEval task (which results are just out [2]) relies on it.

Howeover, the 2.5.1 version, which can be used locally, follows a CC BY-NC-SA 
3.0 license [3].I read in [4] that CC-A (Attribution) licenses are acceptable, 
however I am not completely sure if the NC-SA (Non-commercial/ShareAlike) terms 
would be prohibitive since it was mentioned that : 
"Many of these licenses have specific attribution terms that need to be adhered 
to, for example CC-A, often by adding them to the NOTICE file. Ensure you are 
doing this when including these works. Note, this list is colloquially known as 
the Category A list."
Would like your thoughts on the matter.
Thanks !
Anthony
[1] : http://babelnet.org/download[2] : 
http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2015/cdrom/pdf/SemEval049.pdf[3] : 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
[4] : http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a

> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:09:24 +0200
> Subject: Re: GSoC 2015 - WSD Module
> From: kottm...@gmail.com
> To: dev@opennlp.apache.org
> 
> Hello,
> 
> yes, wordnet is fine, we already depend on it. I just think that remote
> resources are particular problematic.
> 
> For local resources it boils down to their license.
> 
> Here is the wordnet one:
> http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/license/
> 
> We might even be able to redistribute this here at Apache, which is really
> nice. To do that we have to check
> with the legal list if they give a green light for it.
> 
> You can get more information about licenses and dependencies for Apache
> projects here:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
> 
> Are the things you have to clean up of the nature that you couldn't do that
> after you send in a patch?
> This could be removal of code which can be released under ASL.
> 
> We would like to get you integrated into the way we work here as quickly as
> possible.
> 
> That includes:
> - Tasks are planned/tracked via jira (this allows other people to
> comment/follow)
> - We would like to be able to review your code and maybe give some advice
> (commit often, break things down in tasks)
> - Changes or new features are usually discussed a on the dev list (e.g. a
> short write up about the approaches you implemented
>   or better plan to implement)
> 
> Jörn

                                          

Reply via email to