On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
> problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
> these problems.
>
> We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
> problems regarding the 64bit port on MacOS that I will try to explain
> below (hopefully without too many technical details that everybody can
> understand it).
>
> Proposal
> ========
> - Move MacOS 64 bit version to 4.1 and merge stlport relevant changes
> (all platforms) asap into trunk and include them in AOO 4.0.
>
> - Move into showstopper mode next week, beginning with June 3th. Means
> we integrate only showstopper flagged issues and new translations. And
> potentially new art work if we get a new logo and icons in time.
> Deadline for new art work should be June 10th.
>
> I understand your motivation and will not be the showstopper. but my
honest opion is that the reasons for calling it 4.0 get very thin.

Getting a 64 bit release for mac (and possible in linux) is something (as
you write) for a major version and not a minor version like 4.1.

I am against (but will vote -0) of making a release just to hold the
deadline, I would very much prefer to see what a realistic deadline would
be.

rgds
jan I.

Ps. You do a great job as release manager, but someone has to be "devils
advocate".


> - Intensive QA with the stlport changes to detect potential problems
>
> - Create a AOO 4.0 branch 1 week later, June 10th, where we hopefully
> have integrated already returned translations.
>
> - Translation deadline will be set to June 14th to have some time for
> the integration and further testing. Further translations can we release
> at a later time as a special language update release (TBD)
>
>
>
> I would still like to keep the end of June date because everything else
> looks quite nice and we should give our users the new sidebar.
>
> A shifted release date won't really help us because we will move in the
> vacation time and I think it is better to bring the 4.0 version out before.
>
> Once we have solved the mozilla problem for the 64bit version we can
> decide if we want release a 4.1 immediately or later together with
> further improvements, fixes and further languages.
>
>
> Background Explanation
> ======================
>
> Herbert did a great job with his ongoing work to port AOO to 64bit on
> the MacOS platform. This work is mainly triggered and motivated by the
> deprecation of some system abi's and the drop of 32 bit Java. In short
> we switched to the clang compiler, a new platform SDK, XCode4, replaced
> for example atsui API with CoreText, get rid of stlport (on all
> platforms) and did many more cleanup that work that were necessary
> because of better and/or different compiler/linker behaviour or error
> messages etc. Everything looked quite well until we focused on the still
> used precompiled older Mozilla libraries. We currently struggle with
> porting this stuff to 64 bit and evaluating if we can get rid of them
> completely. A complete drop of the mozilla libs would be a further huge
> improvement but it is of course a lot of work to understand the code
> first and all dependencies and to replace it with some new code... At
> the moment we see this on risk for AOO 4.0 and plan to postpone this to
> 4.1.
>
> But the drop of the stlport lib is relevant for all platforms and will
> introduce a binary incompatibility. The best and only time for such an
> incompatible change is a major version. The plan is to extract the
> stlport relevant changes and merge them on trunk asap (this week). This
> will decouple any further work on the 64bit port and we can release the
> 64bit version at any time later (as 4.1) because the 64bit version is
> based on a completely new platform on MacOS additionally to the existing
> one.
>
> The 32bit version will be part of the AOO 4.0 release and we will need
> this version for backward compatibility on older system anyway. The
> 64bit version will run on 10.7 and newer only.
>
>
> I am looking forward to any constructive feedback or concerns.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to