On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 07/19/2013 04:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pesce...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth >>>>> reviewing if you have not looked recently: >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >>> AOO+4.0+Release+Notes<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Indeed, they are nice. The part introducing the Sidebar is very good >>>> too. >>>> >>>> Just a question: we will be promoting this Cwiki page, but: >>>> >>>> 1) I recall seeing that there was a "static" version available for each >>>> page, which was the recommended one for publishing links (and had a URL >>>> ending in .html). I can't see it now. What is the link we should >>>> publish? >>>> >>>> >>> The Press Release went out with a link to the CWiki version of the >>> Release Notes (the only version we have). The blog post links to that >>> as well, though that can be changed if someone makes a static version. >>> >>> >>> The Release Notes on the wiki are really really super! Maybe the most >> beautiful Release Notes I have ever seen! :) >> > > +1, really well done! > > > What I was planning to do -- as soon as additional editing on the >> release >> note stabilize -- is: >> >> 1. make an HTML copy *only* as backup and port that to: >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/**development/releases/4.0.0.**html/<http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/4.0.0.html/> >> >> (so you will see this in the commit logs) >> >> 2. Set up a new link in: >> >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/**development/releases/index.**html<http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/index.html>for >> 4.0.0 >> >> but link it to the CWiki version. >> >> Does that sound OK? >> > > Yes, if you need help just give me a note. > Thanks. I've done this a few times so hopefully no glitches with this one. The static HTML that gets rendered is exactly what is shown in: https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/aoo-40-release-notes.html which I also did not know about. > > Marcus > > > > > 2) May we get rid of the "Upgraded to 3.5.17. Upgrade to 5.1 delayed." >>>> notice in the page header? We've probably get used to it (it's about the >>>> Cwiki upgrade, nothing to do with OpenOffice) and we don't notice it any >>>> longer since it has been there for weeks, but a lot of people are likely >>>> >>> to >>> >>>> mistake it for a notice about the OpenOffice upgrades. >>>> >>>> >>> If you press the '[' key you can eliminate the navigator on the left, >>> but I don't see a special URL for that. It would be great if there >>> was a special URL that would show only the page contents without the >>> nav or header. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> Regards, >>>> Andrea. >>>> >>> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten." -- Jon Bon Jovi
