On 7/26/2013 12:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pavel Janík <pa...@janik.cz> wrote:
Rob,
On Jul 25, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
This is the advantage of writing innovative code, not just copying it.
can you please stop writing such stupid sentences? Notice that I do not talk at
all about the particular license issue.
I'm not talking about license issues either. I'm just saying that if
you are the originator of a feature then you get press coverage twice:
the 1st time when you initially release it and then a 2nd time when
another project copies it. We're seeing that now.
A specific example, Ars Technica, on the LO 4.1 release:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/libreoffice-4-1-is-released-borrows-new-sidebar-from-openoffice/
Your comment there doesn't help anyone.
Peter
Headline: "LibreOffice 4.1 is released, borrows new sidebar from
OpenOffice / 3,000 bugs fixed in latest LibreOffice, many by Apache
developers. "
Regards,
-Rob
Personally, I think it is an advantage to get such press coverage.
Maybe you disagree. But since this is a thread about press coverage,
such observations are entire on topic.
Regards,
-Rob
A few people in other project do the same stuff as you do and maybe you can
fight with them in some mud, but why mud-spraying all the people in this
mailing list?
--
Pavel Janík
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
