On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 22:14:13 -0400: >> On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 21:42:17 -0400: >> >> I'd like to propose a new mailing list: ad...@openoffice.apache.org >> > >> > Public archives or private archives? >> >> I was assuming it would be public. If something needed to be >> discussed privately it could be done on the infra or infra-dev lists. > > infra-dev@ is public. > > infra@ is technically private but allows any committer to subscribe, > which makes it wider than is suitable for some discussions (such as "Who > is going to install that security patch that has just been announced?"). > >> Does that make sense? Or would you recommend something else? > > Hard to say: some topics should be public and some topics need to be > private, but I don't know what topics you guys are looking for a place > to discuss, so I can't say whether a private list or a public list would > better meet your needs. >
It was suggested in another thread, if I understood correctly, that items that would require a secure conversation are ones that would also benefit from having Infra in the loop. There is probably more than one way to do this. -Rob > HTH > > Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
