I Join Kay's with the compliments. Nice ideas. I think you demonstrated how Bootstrap library can be utilized for the Homepage/site.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Emanuele <emanuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As asked by Kay, here it is a new thread. > > > > Unfortunately I didn't have much time to volunteer to this (and I'm not > > sure in the next period either. > > Anyway, if you see anything you want from what I did, feel free to pick > > it (I suppose I can write here it is released under AL2 license and > > everything should be fine). > > > > That said, > > > > Thanks for the new thread and for the interesting new design. Given > discussions about the website home page just form today, you can see there > is considerable interest in improving our landing page. > > Your design incorporates some much needed creative elements! Whenever you > can communicate again is just fine. Looking forward to more of your > communication and ideas. > > > > Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > > Am 07/02/2014 09:41 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > >> Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > >>> Am 07/02/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > >>>> http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it > > >>>> will > > >>>> look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work > with. > > >>> > > >>> Maybe good or bad. But it's definitely a step back as the buttons are > > >>> just colored but now we have a graphic. This would be gone which is, > > >>> hm, > > >>> not good looking... ;-) > > >> > > >> In the buttons of course one could reuse all the graphics, but still > use > > >> Bootstrap buttons for the shape and to highlight the "active" choice. > > > > If the idea is to use bootstrap it may be worth re-adapt the entire HTML > > according to the "bootstrap way". > > It will be a pain at the beginning (it basically means rewrite a lot of > > stuff), but I suppose it would be an advantage in the mid/long term. > > > > For example, another thing I was considering is the separation of the > > menu and the breadcrumbs with a menu fixed-top and the breadcrumbs where > > the are now: > > http://testing.elkarte.it/testing/ooo/index_fix.html > > > > > ah, yes, that would work. > > > > > >> The current divs do not look bad (actually, they look nice!) on the > > >> current homepage, while they don't fit well in the new proposal; > > > > It would be nice to know "why". ;) (Of course just because if you tell > > me the "why" I may try to understand how to fix it.) > > The very first time the hovers were a bit random (they didn't always > > reach the bottom border), in the "second version" they are more > > consistent (except the last two because the underline is not on the > > <li>, but on the <ul>, but that's a detail that can be fixed), if it is > > what you mean. > > > > > > Kay Schenk wrote: > > > The "template" pieces are currently in the /lib and /templates > directory > > of > > > the ooo-site tree. > > > > Are the css "compiled" somehow as well, or are they in the home.css, > > ooo.css, etc. files? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved." > -- George MacDonald > -- טל
