On 01/18/2015 04:27 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 17/01/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: >> It's true the two last nominees -- Jan and Louis -- did discuss their >> views at length, but there was not really much discussion on the >> selections from this list. Contrast this from the discussions that >> preceded the nominations for the initial PMC chair -- >> http://markmail.org/message/fj3ih654amdw4fmg > > The issue was more lack of discussion than lack of time. We allocated > much more time than we did in 2012 to each one of the phases > (nominations, discussion, vote). Nobody can say that we didn't encourage > participation. We didn't have a lot of participation, but there were no > obstacles whatsoever to it.
Dennis alluded to the fact that we did not discuss this singular last candidate -- http://markmail.org/message/4j35qhttrtpgj2ug Looking at the nomination e-mails, in my opinion, it seems that opinions on the nominees was only explicitly discussed by the nominees themselves. So no obstacles to discussion by the community, but no invitation for discussion either. I am probably seeming very disagreeable here. But perhaps the complete process was not clear. > >> Finally, I do hope Andrea might stay on for a bit >> longer while we come to a consensus. > > I gave my availability to resign "as soon as a successor can be > elected", so I'm here in the meantime. Of course, I expected and still > expect this to happen within a reasonable time! > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "There's a bit of magic in everything, and some loss to even things out." -- Lou Reed --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org