On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:04:43 +0100 Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: > > Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability > > at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project > > releases requiring a vote? > > > > If so, what would the verification procedure look like? > > > > We had the first Japanese language update for our Apache branding > > contributed recently and I would like to create an update. > > > > In recent years these artifacts have been built and signed by me and > > submitted using lazy consensus and I have tagged SVN afterward. > > > > You can view the NetBeans page here [1]. > > > > [1] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/57917/apache-openoffice-api-plugin > > @all: > Is there anything that would speak against that Carl is going on with > this procedure from the past? > > Marcus I am completely happy for members with a proven record in a particular area to upgrade or otherwise improve that area without going through complicated formalities. I trust to their goodwill and expertise to co-operate should it prove that such changes are later found to be undesirable. There is a need for protocols, but it seems to me that there is too much bureaucracy, leading to too much hot air discussion and too little action, in "the Apache way". -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
