+1 I think exploring that source being at ASF and the artifact be elsewhere is a good idea.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 09:49 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans [ ... ] > I do prefer this is from the project and if it needs a vote that's okay > I can put together instructions. > > I just didn't want take people away from other tasks unless that's the > way we want it done. > > A few issues I'm not sure how to handle as an official ASF release in > this case. > > 1. You can host the .NBM artifact somewhere besides NetBeans.org but the > plugin page I referenced would become nothing more than an advertisement > and not count downloads, comments, votes, etc. For those features and > for the NetBeans IDE updater mechanism to work it must be hosted at > NetBeans.org. > Maybe hosted at ASF and Netbeans would count? > > 2. The artifact is binary only with no source. > > 3. The artifact must be Java keytool signed and not PGP. At least the > one hosted at Netbeans.org. > > 4. The artifact is built with the NetBeans IDE which PMC members would > need to install. > > Maybe we can come up with an acceptable procedure where the source is > zipped and PGP signed and becomes the release hosted at ASF and a > NetBeans.org compatible artifact is created from it to satisfy both > requirements. > > Thanks, > Carl > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
