Am 23.09.2016 um 00:04 schrieb Marcus:
> great, I've changed some fields to reflect the fix in 4.2.0.
>
> What about this issue? Is this also fixed?
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127125

Yes, that is also fixed with revision 1761439
<https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1761439>
(I forgot my own report...)

>> If I look at
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1761439 there seems
>> to be only one line of code changed?
>
> Even better when this is the entire fix. Looks not too risky for a merge.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>>> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:30 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> [ https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125147 ]
>>>>>> But the fix should be included in one of the next releases.
>>>>>> As well as: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125762
>>>>>
>>>>> Both should be nominated for 4.1.4. If you can check, on a trunk
>>>>> build
>>>>> from a buildbot, that they are fixed on trunk ("4.2.0-dev"), this
>>>>> would be a useful information. If you don't know where to find
>>>>> buildbot builds, just ask.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>    Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to