Am 23.09.2016 um 00:04 schrieb Marcus: > great, I've changed some fields to reflect the fix in 4.2.0. > > What about this issue? Is this also fixed? > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127125
Yes, that is also fixed with revision 1761439 <https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1761439> (I forgot my own report...) >> If I look at >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1761439 there seems >> to be only one line of code changed? > > Even better when this is the entire fix. Looks not too risky for a merge. > > Marcus > > > >>>> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:30 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>> [ https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125147 ] >>>>>> But the fix should be included in one of the next releases. >>>>>> As well as: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125762 >>>>> >>>>> Both should be nominated for 4.1.4. If you can check, on a trunk >>>>> build >>>>> from a buildbot, that they are fixed on trunk ("4.2.0-dev"), this >>>>> would be a useful information. If you don't know where to find >>>>> buildbot builds, just ask. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature