On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> Am 20.03.2017 um 20:01 schrieb Marcus: > > Am 20.03.2017 um 16:40 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Our pre-existing UNO components use service names of the form > >> com.sun.star.*, for example: > >> com.sun.star.comp.sdbc.calc.ODriver > >> com.sun.star.comp.io.TextInputStream > >> com.sun.star.comp.Calc.SpreadsheetDocument > >> > >> I am busy developing a new UNO component, a database driver for > >> PostgreSQL. > >> Should I rather use a prefix such as org.apache.openoffice.* for it > >> instead? > > > > Is it OK to mixup the namespaces within a specific module / code area? > > When you are sure that there won't be any side effects then it's maybe > > OK. > > > > However, to support the consistency within the OpenOffice code I would > > favour the old way. > > That would also be easier to integrate in the SDK... ;-) > > My component's service names would be the pre-existing services: com.sun.star.sdbc.Driver com.sun.star.sdbcx.Driver The interfaces also already exist: com.sun.star.lang.XServiceInfo com.sun.star.sdbc.XDriver com.sun.star.sdbcx.XDataDefinitionSupplier com.sun.star.sdbcx.XCreateCatalog com.sun.star.sdbcx.XDropCatalog Only the implementation name would be in the org.apache.openoffice.* module: org.apache.openoffice.sdbc.comp.postgresql.PostgresqlDriver This won't be visible in the SDK, and will mostly be used internally by DriverManager when connecting to the database.
