Am 02.12.2017 um 14:39 schrieb Marcus: > Am 02.12.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Despite of the name it could be the icon of the dmg file? I don't >> know where this icon set is visible... ;-) >> >> Apart from that: +1 for a public beta. >> >> But we should build "real" beta builds, with the appropriate >> naming/graphics: >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Beta/About%20OpenOffice%20Beta%204.2.0.png >> > > oh yes, good hint. IMHO the splash screen and start center graphic > should show clearly that this is a beta release. Plus different > filenames for the installation files.
That is all handled by building for target "openofficebeta" (sdkoobeta/ooobetalanguagepack). I am just uploading a fresh Beta build for Windows: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Beta/ Regards, Matthias > > Marcus > > > >> Am 01.12.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> My latest 4.2.0-dev builds are available at >>> >>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1816768/ >>> <http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1816768/> >>> >>> But these are dmg's not installers. >>> >>>> On Dec 1, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Matthias >>>> Seidel<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> Did you have the opportunity to install 4.2.0 on macOS? >>>> >>>> I would be interested if the new icon does show up: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo3_installer.icns >>>> >>>> >>>> I created it on Windows with a program called "iConvertIcons" and >>>> had no >>>> chance to test it. >>>> >>>> Regards, Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 01.12.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>> I like it. I already have Linux, Windows and macOS 4.2.0-dev >>>>> builds available >>>>> (http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ >>>>> <http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>) for some langs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Marcus<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 30.11.2017 um 21:26 schrieb Dave Fisher: >>>>>>> In light of our current situation with getting builds together >>>>>>> but not having a lot of people doing more than simple QA what >>>>>>> does the team think about releasing a Public Beta for 4.2.0? I >>>>>>> think that this would be an advantage for the project and might >>>>>>> serve to bring in more of the community as QA volunteers. >>>>>> I thought it's without discussion that we need a (long) beta test >>>>>> phase for 4.2.0. So, yes for your proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> We can create a new entry on the download webpage, some >>>>>> advertising areas on the other webpages, and other fine things to >>>>>> make it visible. >>>>>> >>>>>> And - also this should be clear already - we need several builds >>>>>> of 4.2.0 with further included bugfixes; to show an increasing >>>>>> quality towards the final release build. >>>>>> >>>>>> For me the real question is " *When* do we start the beta? ". ;-) >>>>>> I would like to have a specific level of quality that we give to >>>>>> our users. Otherwise we will get spammed by bug reports which >>>>>> nobody wants to handle. >>>>>> >>>>>> Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
