To me a vote with one candidate is a "all In vote". If the vote fails we
are back again at the far more serious questions that we just came away
from.
A vote where I step up not as equal is also not acceptable since it
would be a fake. So if I follow nomination now it have to be a serious
one, now as in future.
When I stepped up I stepped up because no one else did. You stepped up
after I did and I liked it a lot. *thumbsup*
For the final vote we are 2 people now. Which is the minimum of a health
requirement I have.
Who ever get the job this year, the other one will be nominate next
year. Thats good. I totaly agree with Markus: we should make it possible
that the Chair keeps rotating. It is something the PMC can do.
3 Nominates will be awesome, people. Markus says it is doable even with
minimum time. Please watch us and consider your nomination next year!
We all have time issues that will not go away and we have to priorize
what is important to us. And loosing or winning this vote is less
important to me then the health of OpenOffice. I will be active where my
time is needed most, and stubbornly try to work deeper into OpenOffice.
I read Andrea's view with a great delight, I realy liked it.
@List:
Please, copy the vote sheet from below. Make your choice and take a vote.
Every one who is reading this list for what ever reason has the right to
pick a vote.
There is no harm in doing so!
On 09.12.2017 00:11, Carl Marcum wrote:
Thanks for all who voted for me.
I do believe in you despite the workload we all share. You can do it
with the same dedication I can. :-D
You are very much welcome to get my vote in return.
*Vote Sheet:*
[x] Carl Marcum (cmarcum)
[ ] Peter Kovacs (petko)
[ ] Abstain (I cannot/won't choose between them)
All the Best
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
