On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Peter kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote: > The Thanks should go to Damjan, who is doing the task. I thought it was obvious the acknowledgement was directed at Damjan.
Notwithstanding, unlike you, prior OO 'chairs' never even acknowledged -- much less impulsed -- the gstreamer-1.0 request. That's why I think you are doing great job, Peter. > He decided this is important. > > I did nothing. > > Am 1. März 2018 01:24:24 MEZ schrieb Jose R R <jose....@metztli.com>: >>Niltze[Hello] all- >> >>On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> >>wrote: >>> I've successfully patched our gstreamer plugin to build with >>gstreamer-1.0, >>> but how do I test it? Does someone have a sample document that uses >>> gstreamer? >>> >>> The patch is attached for anyone interested. Parts may still be >>wrong, eg. >>> filter names. Changes between GStreamer 0.1 and 1.0 are documented >>here: >>> >>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/application-development/appendix/porting-1-0.html >>> >>https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/plain/docs/random/porting-to-1.0.txt >>> >>Cool! I had requested the same feature from OO long time ago. And no >>one answered. I think Peter is doing a great job. >> >>I will test your patch in my next build as I am also excited about >>that feature. BIG THANK YOU! >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Damjan Jovanovic >><dam...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I've begun having a look. >>>> >>>> We currently test for gstreamer in configure.ac but don't use the >>result, >>>> re-running pkg-config in a main/avmedia's makefile. >>>> >>>> Changing the version number to 1.0 breaks the build due a missing >>header >>>> file. Removing that "#include" gets it a little further, but it >>breaks due >>>> to changed gstreamer API functions. There is also lots of warnings >>about >>>> deprecated GDK functions. I'll continue trying later. >>>> >>>> We should really get rid of gstreamer 0.1 ASAP one way or the other: >>given >>>> how it's been unmaintained since 2013, it may well have security >>>> vulnerabilities. We can't ship it to users since its license is >>>> incompatible, but having users install it separately still invites >>trouble. >>>> >>>> Damjan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Torokhov Sergey >><torokhov-...@yandex.ru> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, Peter. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for reply and for adding additional info into AOO wiki. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I'm posted on that project is short of developers this time. >>>>> I hope that current implementation still will hold several years >>>>> because gstreamer-0.10 of long process of skiping this brach >>>>> in linux distributibes. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe during this transition period at least the way to standalone >>build >>>>> of appropriate multimedia AOO library will be found if it possible >>at >>>>> all. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately I suppose I have no enough programming skills >>>>> to understand how build system works and the difference between >>>>> gstreamer-0.10 and 1.0 API/ABI . >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sergey >>>>> >>>>> 25.02.2018, 12:20, "Peter Kovacs" <pe...@apache.org>: >>>>> > Hello, >>>>> > >>>>> > I have hoped that you will get a more positive answer then mine. >>>>> > I have found no evidence that we have ever worked on an update of >>>>> > multimedia Libs in any direction. The only thing I have found is >>>>> > someone >>>>> > tried to compile the old 0.1.0 Gstreamer interface on modern >>systems. >>>>> > I think it is unlikely we will see an update in 4.2.0, since >>there is >>>>> > no >>>>> > evidence of a volunteer working on it. Of course we would like to >>have >>>>> > a >>>>> > better solution then we have now. >>>>> > >>>>> > In order to advance step by step I have started to collect >>Information >>>>> > of possible solutions. And prepared to collect more Informations >>where >>>>> > maybe another volunteer could start on. >>>>> > I have not started any dicusssion, because my limit on driving >>topics >>>>> > has been been reached. If you like you could help collecting the >>>>> > informations needed to implement the stuff. If you have >>programming >>>>> > skills you are welcome to try, but I believe it is a challenging >>>>> > Journey. >>>>> > My current plan is to reduce all the szuff that makes work on >>Open >>>>> > Office step by step in order to get into a better shape that we >>can >>>>> > work >>>>> > on topics. But currently this is all but in infant state. I >>welcome any >>>>> > help. >>>>> > >>>>> > The Point of Interest List I have started you find at >>>>> > >>>>> > >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=67633711 >>>>> > it collects all sort of topics I think I need look into. >>>>> > The Wikipage I have started to collect Information for a new >>multimedia >>>>> > backened you find at >>>>> > >>>>> > >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/new+multimedia+Backend >>>>> > >>>>> > I am sorry I could not invest more time in this point. >>>>> > >>>>> > All the best >>>>> > Peter >>[...] Best Professional Regards. -- Jose R R http://metztli.it --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Download Metztli Reiser4: Debian Stretch w/ Linux 4.14 AMD64 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- feats ZSTD compression https://sf.net/projects/metztli-reiser4/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
