Hi Dave, Am 18.01.19 um 06:54 schrieb Dave Fisher: > What action is there to take? It is a valid action by a downstream. Do we > wish they posted changes upstream? Yes! Can we require it? No!
It was just a funny side note for a fork that claims to be the "real" successor of OpenOffice.org. They forked in 2011(?) but list copyright back to 2000. Maybe here is some action to be taken? Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 17, 2019, at 9:19 PM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> The Question is: >> >> Do we want to take action here or not? >> >> >>> On 17.01.19 21:19, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Marcus, >>> >>>> Am 17.01.19 um 20:42 schrieb Marcus: >>>>> Am 17.01.19 um 13:41 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>> Two of my commits were immediately picked by LO. [1] [2] >>>>> >>>>> Always nice to see, that down streaming still works for the fork... :-D >>>> sure, better then to draw this on their own. >>>> >>>> Again with a note who has tested and reviewed it - which is totally >>>> fine - but no hint where it comes from and who is the author. They >>>> still don't want to tell where they get the code from. >>> Not exactly, Pilot_Pirx is me... ;-) >>> >>> But now it looks like I would have committed it directly to LO, while >>> they just monitor aoo/trunk and take what they can use. [1] >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/1170f10906a9bca78782df6ab1b6a4e20cf0435a >>> >>>> Is this redicioulous or just sad? I don't know. :-( >>>> >>>> Marcus >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/28dee1129c7a9c4da34b9253aefd6c6b2df1a073 >>>>> >>>>> [2] >>>>> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/9796738e1149a99f8b3ff687b0f72264ba3a56ff >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Am 14.01.19 um 16:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>> At this stage, I think just back porting (svn merge) to the AOO42X >>>>>> branch is fine. >>>>>> As we get close to a release, we'll need to either have an RM >>>>>> approve it >>>>>> or so something like creating a STATUS file, with a list of proposed >>>>>> backports >>>>>> and requiring at least 3 +1s to backport (ie: RTC) >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 09.01.19 um 21:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2019, at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ahh... something w/ the cppuhelper stuff. Obviously, some UDK >>>>>>>>> issue I'm thinking... >>>>>>> How is the process to get commits merged from trunk to AOO42X? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I adjusted some pointers for Windows and Linux: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851110 >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851111 >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1851214 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Additionally I updated some pointers for OS/2. I know that Bitwise is >>>>>>> already working on a port of 4.2.0, so they would be useful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since it took me several attempts it would be easier, if I would >>>>>>> commit >>>>>>> them directly. .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeppers... for sure it's the udk versioning, which is more a Linux >>>>>>>> thing than a macOS (or Windows) thing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will look into either hacking around it or something else. I >>>>>>>> thought I had fixed it. Obviously not :( >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
