Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers 
voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in 
order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test attendance for a 
single feature.

How about we schedule a test release every quarter? These releases do not 
necessary lead to a release and are announced as unstable. But it would give 
people a better time frame to plan and we can advertise for tester.

I build new versions about every second week.
For sure, people are downloading these builds and use them on a daily
base. Still no feedback!

The problem isn't about the builds...

to make it a bit more comfortable for you: What about to build only when it is worth it (e.g., after some commits or bigger/important commits and not with a fixed time schedule?

Just a thought.

Marcus



Am 30. September 2019 21:13:52 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
Hi Dave,

Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Matthias,

I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)

My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to
switch and they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have then
the change make sense.

The user is still free to choose whatever JRE he/she wants (and is
detected by AOO).

I build with AdoptOpenJDK for some weeks now [1] and have found no
problems. But that *really* needs more testing...

Regards,

    Matthias

[1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

Regards,
Dave

On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Seidel
<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
No feedback=No interest?

Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...

Regards,

    Matthias


Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Keith, all,

Did you have time to test?

Feedback is always welcome... ;-)

Regards,

    Matthias

Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,

Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Keith,

Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi all,

At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for
Windows with
the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing.
I am not
a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it.

Damjan recently introduced some patches, so AOO can now work
with
AdoptOpenJDK.
It is available in 32 bit, which is still needed for Windows
[1].
I am just doing a build for AOO 4.2.0 with AdaptOpenJDK (8u222)
and it
looks good so far...

What do you think?

Regards,

    Matthias

[1]

https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot#x32_win

Mathias;

This sounds like it has great potential as it appears to gives
us a
potential path beyond version 8 as a cursory reading of the
AdoptOpenJDK
web site shows that it supports version 11 and 12 for both both
Windows
32 and 64 bit systems.

I look forward to testing your new version 4.2.0 build with the
AdoptOpenJDK.
You will find them at the usual place:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

They should be up tomorrow.
Builds are online!

Please test, especially everything related to Java. ;-)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to