Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing >> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the >> rug out from under people when bumping patch revs. > > That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I > wanted you to have a look. > > Maybe the patch works also with 10.7? > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> >>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, Don, >>> >>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> Let's commit and work after pushed. >>> We should try >>> >>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 >>> >>> again for 4.1.8. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>> Hi Don, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into >>>>>>>> AOO418. >>>>>>>> There are two categories: >>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk >>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD >>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been >>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to >>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f >>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 >>>>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build >>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it >>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments >>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this >>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version >>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the >>>>>>>> JDK. >>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which >>>>>>>> have the changes. >>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal >>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that >>>>>>> all objects get visited >>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using >>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to >>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback. >>>>>> >>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8. >>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim. >>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should >>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be >>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the >>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it. >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double >>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE. >>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not >>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we >>>>> build with Java 8? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>
