Hi Jim, Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
I think so: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0 Especially this one from you ;-) https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089 Regards, Matthias > >> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing >>> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull >>> the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs. >> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I >> wanted you to have a look. >> >> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jim, Don, >>>> >>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed. >>>> We should try >>>> >>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 >>>> >>>> again for 4.1.8. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>> Hi Don, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into >>>>>>>>> AOO418. >>>>>>>>> There are two categories: >>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk >>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD >>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been >>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to >>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f >>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 >>>>>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build >>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it >>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured >>>>>>>>> comments >>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this >>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer >>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the >>>>>>>>> JDK. >>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which >>>>>>>>> have the changes. >>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal >>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that >>>>>>>> all objects get visited >>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using >>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to >>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8. >>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim. >>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should >>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be >>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the >>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double >>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE. >>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not >>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we >>>>>> build with Java 8? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
